Friday, August 2, 2013

Stop Talks with Russia?

    Russia granted temporary asylum Thursday to fugitive National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden. According to the Washington Times, this prompted President Obama to threaten boycotting a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The incident also caused Sen. John McCain (AZ) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (SC), to issue a joint statement saying “Now is the time to fundamentally rethink our relationship with Putin’s Russia,They called on the Obama administration to push for expanded missile defense programs in Europe and to “move expeditiously on another round of NATO expansion, including the Republic of Georgia,” which Russia invaded several years ago.    This is ridiculous! Are we going to let warmongers John McCain and apparently Lindsey Graham push us into a war with Russia over a minor incident of whether one person gets asylum in one country or another?
    In addition, is that incident justification to stop the top leaders of each of two major countries from talking with each other? It seems to me that when such an incident develops, conversation should be increased in order to determine the real basis for the difference of opinion. It is a well-known and accepted procedure that when you have something against someone else, you meet with that person and try to resolve the situation. Only stupid people or those extremely egocentric will jeopardize a relationship on the basis of not knowing the reasons for another person's position.

1 comment:

  1. Dear Anonymous,
    Thanks for your comments involving shutting off communication with the Russians, because of the Snowden asylum.
    I am adding your following comments to my blog:
    "Actually, it is my belief that the less Obama talks with any other world
    leader the better off we are. Remember the open microphone incident when
    Obama told the Russian ambassador to tell Putin that after the election he
    would be able to proceed with actions that would likely be viewed as treason
    and otherwise could have caused him to lose the second term election. Obama
    has already indicated that after he was reelected that he would proceed with
    the destruction of America and any other acts of treason he could envision.
    Obama is a disaster at foreign policy overall even if he did partially
    reverse course in Iraq to follow the blue print from previous
    administrations as initiated by Reagan.
    However, with a true American leader who is actually loyal to America, I
    agree with your viewpoint that talking is preferred over posturing as long
    as you know how to say no as Reagan did in Iceland when negotiating with
    Gorbachev. Reagan's "Neht" that horrified our State Department, was the
    start of finally negotiating from strength rather than contemptible weakness
    as Democrats always do when representing the interests of America.
    Certainly John McCain is a total disaster as a Senator. He has more than
    disgraced his distinguished military service with his enabling the liberals
    in destroying America. I would give McCain the benefit of doubt that his
    actions are from lack of understanding of elementary economics, basic
    freedom, our Constitution, or an understanding of the forces he is enabling
    that are systematically destroying us. However, because of his power, his
    actions are destructive never the less.
    Actually, the rhetoric about strengthening our Military is a joke given the
    massive efforts to unilaterally disarm and weaken America. If history
    repeats itself, this will once again cause America to be attacked. However,
    the real federal funds are being spent purchasing enough hollow point
    bullets (outlawed for use by the Military) for Homeland Security to kill
    every man woman and child in America at least 3 times over. The NSA will be
    able to provide intelligence as to which citizens are a threat."

    ReplyDelete