EIN News says, "Discord Grows in Washington Over a Potential Role in the Libya Conflict Nearly three weeks after Libya erupted in what may now turn into a protracted civil war, the politics of military intervention to speed the ouster of Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi grow more complicated by the day รข€” for both the White House and Republicans. President Obama, appearing with Australia's prime minister, tried to raise the pressure on Colonel Qaddafi further by talking about "a range of potential options, including potential military options" against the embattled Libyan leader. (nytimes.com)".
I'm glad to see discord in Washington, because with such discord there is little likelihood of action, which is really the correct approach.
The basis of the apparent discord is not revealed, but presumably it is those who are for and those who are against military intervention.
For those who are favorable to military intervention, I ask, as I have before, do you really want to support a rebel organization which is likely to result in Libyan control by the Muslim brotherhood, whose doctrine is to either convert Christians to Islam or kill them.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment