Monday, November 2, 2009

Radical Liberals in Government

The following is an e-mail received from a friend, with whom I had been having a discussion on idealism and the actions of radical liberals in government:

"Certainly, most of the local liberals I know and many. such as Carol, are loyal Americans. Many have fought for our country. Some even show
compassion for others using their own money which is totally contrary to most liberals in power. I can site names of some of the most compassionate
liberal people who attend our church, are loyal Americans, and would never knowingly vote to destroy our country. They are passionate about
their beliefs. They are also often blinded. What was considered liberal even 20 years ago in most of America is not at all what we see today.
Liberal Republicans also now lay with the most extreme liberals of the mainstream Democratic party. The 60's radicals, who were terrorists wanting to overthrow America, were still outside of the mainstream Democratic party. In fact, in the 50's through the 90's Democrats who
controlled their party in the South were more conservative than the mainstream country club Republicans back East. Reagan was elected in a
landslide that included a substantial number of Democrats.

I used to agree with you about the more dedicated liberals, who are now in power, not believing that their actions will destroy America. However, after
reading their own words and viewing a number of their statements in recent months concerning some of the items I included in my original comments you mentioned that you wanted to post to your blog, I have come to accept these people at their own words. Some of them really do believe that
America should lose its sovereignty and that we are evil. These same people praise Mao and the current crazies from Iran and Cuba and the most crooked leaders around the world. Obama certainly studied at the feet of anti-American revolutionaries. The Czars Obama has appointed have clearly stated their mission for one-world government and elimination of most of the
rights from the Bill of Rights. Observers from other countries, who are still democracies, have observed that Obama envisions himself as being a
world leader (dictator). Moveon.org has also made its goals clear. These organizations have tremendous (illegal financial) support from outside
the US and those folks are not pro-America under any circumstances. There is a reason that hundreds of millions of dollars flow into Democratic coffers from China and the Middle East to support folks that openly advocate against
America's interests. When someone powerful who have a known antagonistic view toward us says something, I believe them and do not try to rationalize that they really did not mean it, when their comments suggest goals that include a weaker America, our defeat on the battlefield, and our outright destruction.

The founders of our country were revolutionaries, but their startling thoughts included the founding principals of individual liberty and limited
government that were at odds with the royalty and world power structures of the 1700's Today's revolutionaries have made it abundantly clear that they want to over-throw those founding principals. Just listen to their words.
Glen Beck on Fox news has simply been playing video clip after video clip of them making their objectives clear. They make no bones about their effort to spend the US into a crisis to absolutely destroy our society. They make no bones about never wasting a crisis to cease power. They make no pretense of respecting the Constitution or the Bill of Rights and openly discuss ways to eliminate these fundamental rights of property, free speech, or right to bear arms. You hear demands to redistribute wealth almost daily. If you look very hard, you will find extensive discussion that goes back to stated objectives about spending any country into a crisis in order
to create a virtual dictatorship even when the words for dictator are altered, but the meaning is clear.

While I agree that people like Carol do not necessarily want to destroy America, she certainly believes that our country should be forever reshaped and that religion should be stamped out. She is a big supporter of the ACLU in that mission. She is part of the group that wants to
fundamentally change our culture to the point that it can never come back from their socialist paradigm. I also believe the founding fathers were
correct when they stated that a democracy could not function in the absence of Christianity, while also opposing a state religion.

Even LBJ made that clear. After introducing the war on poverty, he then turned to his supporters and stated that this would finally put the
Democrats into absolute power for 50 to 100 years. He was a brilliant and relatively un-principaled man, who knew exactly what he was doing. He succeeded in creating an underclass. His programs also create massive debt and
dependence for generations. Though LBJ was a liberal, I do not think that he was for destroying America. But I do believe, from their own
words that the current extreme leadership does want to transform our society and to keep it transformed. They must take our sovereignty. It matters not which ones do not simply drink the Koolaid. The result is the same and the danger is imminent.

I am becoming more alarmed every day, but I do hope and pray that my conclusions are wrong.

No comments:

Post a Comment