In the following opinion on "Opinion Polls" by
anonymous CJ, he is confining his discussion to political polls. He essentially
finds opinion polls of no value, for the reasons
given.
You decide whether to put any credence in opinion
polls, as continually reported by the news
media.
While I tend to agree with CJ, this leaves me in
the uncomfortable position of assuming there is nothing to predict reasonably
the outcome of an election.
Opinion Polls by
CJ
The media are infatuated with public opinion
polls and talk about them regularly. In
fact, most reporters either do not understand the limitations of opinion polls
or simply do not provide the basic information for their evaluation. Statistical theory clearly shows that a valid
sample of a population will provide a good estimate of outcomes.
In political opinion polls there are three
populations from which to draw a
sample:
a. Those of voting
age
b. Registered
voters
c. Likely
voters
Conclusions drawn from sampling the first
population are generally meaningless in terms of probable
outcomes.
Surveys of registered voters are unlikely to
provide a valid sample since only 55% of registered voters actually vote in
presidential elections.
Likely voters is the population that will provide
a good estimate of outcomes. However,
that population is the most difficult to identify. In personal telephone surveys, the polling
agency tries to define the likely voter population by asking interviewees about
prior voting participation and assuming that the answer is the truth. Just think about the likelihood that an
interviewee will admit that he or she did not exercise the voting franchise.
Surveys done by “robocalls” have even less chance of identifying likely
voters.
Now think about how many times a reporter
identifies the sampled population.
Instead, they trumpet the “margin of error” whatever that
means.
“ Figures can lie and liars can
figure”
No comments:
Post a Comment