The Washington Times says a vehicle belonging to a team investigating the Syrian
regime’s alleged use of chemical weapons has been “deliberately shot at multiple
times” by unidentified snipers in Damascus.
Who is
surprised by that? Let's look at it from the points of view of both the Syrian
government and the rebels. Remember, they are the people who have the guns and
do the shooting. Both
sides have an interest and confidence in their own operations. The government
plans to defeat the rebels and vice versa. Neither side would like interference
from outsiders, unless it can be assured that the interference would be
favorable to its side. Since it is not absolutely clear that UN presence would
favor one side or the other, each side would likely feel threatened by UN
presence. The best way to get the UN out is to use snipers, which then cannot be
identified as a specific side.
The only way the UN could not be attacked
locally is for both the government and rebels to have decided they are tired of
the whole mess and wish to call a draw. At that point the UN would be
welcome.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I wished our foreign policy in regards to the Middle East was:
ReplyDeleteWhen 2 of your enemies are fighting each other.... make sure neither runs out of bullets.