Andrea Widener has a longer article in
the November 5 issue of Chemical and Engineering News concerning immigration of
scientifically trained persons to the US.
US companies looking for highly skilled workers claim that more visas and green
cards are needed for foreign nationals to fill open positions and keep the
companies competitive internationally. Congress is apparently listening.
However, this appears to the writer to be a rather strange problem. Most of the
people that these companies apparently desire have been trained at US
universities under the financial benefits of government grants from US
taxpayers. That trained group of scientists includes US citizens and
noncitizens.
From previous articles in C&E News concerning employment
of newly produced graduates with Masters and PhD degrees, there seems to be a
steady moaning concerning lack of job opportunities. Most of these complaints
seem to come from Americans rather than foreigners. Does this mean that the
American graduates are less trained than the foreign graduates at the same
universities? I doubt it.
Why then the steady drumming of companies
claiming an insufficient supply of qualified scientists? The answer is simple.
Companies like to keep their payroll expenses as low as possible. They can hire
foreign graduates from US universities at lower salaries, and the greater the
supply of US trained foreign graduates, the more talent they can obtain for the
buck.
I am not especially sympathetic to the plight of recently US
trained American scientists concerning job opportunities, and therefore, would
not oppose an increase in the visa and green cards for US trained foreign
scientists. It is certainly better to allow US trained foreign scientists to
remain in the country in a productive capacity, as opposed to the societal cost
of administering to untrained illegal immigrants, who sneak across the
border.
However, I have said in a separate writing that I am strongly
opposed to US trained foreign scientists working on confidentially sensitive
research and development at the US Department of Defense.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment