Open
Email to Sen. Cornyn (TX):
Sen. Cornyn,
Thank you for your form letter on the Farm
Bill.
You said you did not vote for the Senate version, because it
unnecessarily held support for farmers and ranchers hostage to the unchecked
growth of food stamp entitlements and other non-farming programs, costing 60
percent more than the last authorization, in 2008.
Congratulations for
voting against it.
You also said It failed to provide farmers a true
safety net in difficult years, failed to fully target assistance to those most
in need, and failed to prioritize farm aid over duplicative programs,
subsidizing unrelated issues from green energy to housing. It is shameful that
Washington was unable to responsibly address the true needs of American
farmers..
It is at that point where we have a strong difference of
opinion. Farming is a business, clear and simple. It is not up to the federal
taxpayers to supply a safety net for farmers in difficult years and target
assistance for those most in need. Economic difficulties in years of drought or
other adverse weather conditions can be alleviated by insurance, which should be
paid by farmers as a cost of doing business. Those most in need likely do not
need assistance. The implication is that they are incompetent businessmen, and
should leave the business to those more able to make it work. There obviously
should be no duplicative programs, when we should not even have initial
programs. Any farm bill should
be stripped down to its bare essentials, which involves essentially no taxpayer
subsidization of any kind, but consideration made for public protection against
famine. The inclusion of issues on green energy and housing is particularly
ridiculous. It smacks of Congress at its worst, which is payola for subsequent
votes to remain in office.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment