Copy of open email to Representative Neugebauer (Texas):
Randy,
I read your newsletter, and
have a few comments.
On comprehensive
immigration reform, you say a bipartisan group from the House of Representatives
will soon release a proposal and that you are waiting to learn the details. It
seems to me that you should be part of the bipartisan group preparing the
details. I agree with the various points you make on the subject, but you don't
need to sell them to me, you need to sell them to your Congressional
Associates.
On the subject of the proposed $100 departure tax for airline
passengers, I suggest you look at the detail. If this is a general tax, you and
I should be opposed. On the other hand, if it is a recovery of an expense from
operating the system of air traffic control or other aspects related to airport
operations, passengers should pay the required fee. It should not be the
taxpayer's responsibility to subsidize traffic or anything else through
government doles.
If the "morning after" pill adequately prevents
conception without any significant negative physiological reactions, I believe
it should be offered over-the-counter in the same way as aspirin. Such
availability will undoubtedly contribute to the use of abortion by young
teenagers. While I don't believe that is desirable, the present socialistic
system of health benefits at the expense of taxpayers justifies such action. If
one less child is born out of wedlock and forced on the taxpayers for public
support, there is an obvious economic advantage. Let us also remember that it is
the basic parent's responsibility to educate their children on sex and control
their actions when they are underage. If you want to avoid the availability of
the "morning after" pill to teenagers, you are obligated to also revise the
healthcare system so that it is no longer publicly supported.
You have not
mentioned the details about the three items that you will be voting on next
week. However, on the Energy item, you will want to strongly support the
Keystone pipeline and increased availability of permits for oil and natural gas
drilling on federal lands, including coastal water areas. On the National Labor
Relations Board item, your position should be that government should not support
the development of unions. However, workers should have the right to establish
unions and worker participation should be optional without the mandatory payment
of union dues. The five-year Farm Bill item should be primarily directed to
stabilization of farm product availability to avoid potential famine. It should
allow for market forces to be at work in order to generally control prices and
availability within normal limits and allow for government interference using
more drastic measures only when food shortages are obviously imminent.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment